Notes
advaitism.com
Some thoughts in progress.
IT isn't about YOU becoming enlightened.
IT isn't about YOU becoming awakened.
IT isn't about YOU gaining awareness.
IT isn't about YOU being in the here and now.
IT isn't about YOU entering a state of higher consciousness.
IT isn't about YOUR consciousness.
What is IT for a bird?
What is IT for a tree?
What is IT for a rock?
What is IT for YOU?
IT is that which is.
-- Brian William Drisko, 28-May-2010 08:43 bwd@advaitism.com
The above has been featured on the main page of
Advaitism.com.
It is a good example of
"That which can be put into words is not the Truth" and
"Words fail us, but they are doing the best they can".
In the above "YOU" and "YOUR" refer to who we usually think we are: a single consciousness
separate from all the rest of existence. It refers to the "YOU" that sees itself as one thing,
and sees the rest of all existence that interacts with us as another thing.
This is the core of duality.
But, if you look at "YOU" and "YOUR" as referring to who "YOU" really are,
which is all that exists, then of course IT IS "about YOUR consciousness".
This is why words fail us even though they are trying as hard as they can to convey a clear message
and why that which can be put into words is not the Truth.
In attempting to convey the idea that "IT isn't about YOU", one first has to decide what is the
meaning of "YOU". With what we usually think "YOU" means and who we think and feel we are, which
gives us our gut feel for who "YOU" refers to above, then the above can be a pointer
and something interesting to think about. If, on the other hand, you look from the perspective
of Non-Duality where there is no "YOU" separate from IT, then the above makes little sense and
offers no pointer.
Just as a side note: If YOU are pondering why YOU can't perceive existence from the mind of
another when IT is non-dual and IT is both of you, that is because you are still interpreting
YOUR experience from the illusion of being separate from the whole.
Actually, YOU ALREADY ARE experiencing reality from the perspective of all beings.
It just doesn't seem that way.
-- Brian William Drisko, 28-May-2010 09:56 bwd@advaitism.com
Do you have more than one stream of consciousness in your mind?
How do you know?
An oft used example in Non-Duality is that we are like a child on a ride in an amusement park
with a steering wheel that isn't connected to anything. Thus, if we steer in the direction the
ride is going anyway, then we appear to be in control. But if the ride won't take us
where we steer, then we think we need to learn how to steer better. Some suggest that we have
a better understanding of existence when we see that our steering wheel is not connected to
anything.
Not exactly on the same topic, but a similar example might be used within the content of the play
to see a source of much frustration. Sometimes in an amusement park ride everyone in the same
boat has their own steering wheel. Naturally, in the ride, none of them are connected. But what
if ALL the steering wheels were connected and a computer averaged which way everyone was turning
to determine the actual course of the ride? (There are actually some virtual reality type rides
in some of the newer amusement parks that DO work this way!)
Think of your awareness as just one member of a "steering committee" in your mind.
You'd then have some say in what actions you will take (where to steer your ship),
but not the only say. If you want your ship to go in a certain direction,
you must convince enough of the others on the "steering committee" to head in that direction.
Thus, you may be more effective setting the direction by working on the other members of the
"steering committee" than trying to turn the wheel harder.
Think about how this might work in your own life. Think about when you want to do something, but
also DON'T want to do that thing. Who is it that wants to do that thing? Who is it that doesn't
want to do that thing? What is it that you end up doing? Who wins the battle over which way to
steer? Why?
-- Brian William Drisko, 17-May-2010 0900 bwd@advaitism.com
There aren't steps, but let's pretend there are.
1) To cease suffering, learn to stop being taken in by the illusion.
The root cause of suffering is wanting things to be other than they are.
Examine for what ultimate purpose do things need to be different than what they are.
If everything in the universe could be ultimately changed to the way you want it to be,
would that have a permanent impact on you that would last for all eternity?
If not, would it have a permanent impact on your children or others that you care about
that will last for all eternity?
Would changing the world to be the way you want it to be have any permanent impact on anyone
or anything for all eternity?
If you believe that all your efforts to change the world will not be permanent and last for all
eternity, then is it still important to exert such efforts?
This is not an argument to convince you that it is not important to make such efforts.
Rather it is a question to ask yourself of why you make such efforts to change the world to be
the way you'd rather it be if the results of such efforts are impermanent.
If in the end the results of any efforts you make to change the world to be the way you want it
to be are washed away in the eons of time, does it make sense to worry about changing the world
to be the way you want it to be?
Some come to the conclusion that expending great efforts to change the world are worth it even
if they only lead to temporary happiness for themselves, those they care about, or others.
But if you refuse to be happy until you change the world to be just the way you want it to be,
then you may have a very long wait and be suffering for a very long time.
The first illusion to overcome is to understand that the world does not have to be the way you
want it to be in order for you, for those you care about, or for anyone to find happiness. It
is an illusion that the world must be a certain way for anyone to find happiness.
There are all sorts of people that are happy at times or suffering at times. It does not matter
if they are wealthy or poor, famous or unknown, wise or ignorant, talented or untalented, smart
or stupid. There is no particular way the world must be before we have the requirements to be
happy.
If we want to end suffering in our own lives, then we must break ourselves of this illusion that
the world must be the way we want it to be before we will allow ourselves to be happy. If you
want to help your children to be happy, those you care about be happy, or others to be happy,
all you can do is help them see through the illusion that the world being the way they want it
to be is not a prerequisite to happiness.
Note 1: The essay here is focused on happiness and suffering relating to the majority of
people that live in prosperous first world nations where most sufferiing is more "neurotic"
than from physical lack. Those of you reading this are probably not suffering from a lack of
food, water, shelter, warm clothing, etc. or suffering from a painful medical condition.
Elimination of suffering is available to even people in those more physically painful circumstances
but that is not the topic of the essay here. This is targeted more to those who have created their
own hell on earth by falling for the illusion that the world must be the way they want it to be
before they will allow themselves to find happiness in life.
Note 2: The basis of Buddhism is dukkha and the elimination of dukkha. "Dukkha" is
often translated in the west as "suffering" but that is not an exact or accurate translation.
Maybe a better but still incomplete definition would be a feeling of uneasiness because of things
not being the way one wants them to be. We believe the world must change to be a certain way before
we will be able to feel at ease with the world. The essence of Buddhism is the elimination of
dukkha by helping us to see the illusion that the world MUST BE a certain way before we can
live at ease with it. The rough translation of "dukkha" as "suffering" will work adequately at
this point of the essay. A refinement of the definition will be presented when needed later.
2. Looking for the "I".
3. Figuring out the purpose of existence.
4. Understanding the Non-Duality of Existence.
-- Brian William Drisko, 25-Apr-2010 1110 bwd@advaitism.com
Pre-verbal vs. Non-verbal brain functioning. Pre-verbal brain functioning is a bit of a misnomer.
We are born with non-verbal brain functioning.
Animals have non-verbal brain functioning. After we develop verbal brain functioning, our non-verbal brain functioning continues
to operate for the remainder of our lives. We just don't seem to notice it because it is our verbal brain functioning that
defines what we usually mean by "what we are thinking".
Much of what guides our lives, desires, fears, etc. is all non-verbal. Our verbal thinking tells us that we are our
verbal thinking. But that is not what we are. Our verbal thinking is just language symbols that arise in our brains.
The source of them is from lower non-verbal levels. Thoughts are just the end product of our non-verbal brain functioning
turning concepts into verbal symbols.
Verbal symbols are far from perfect representations of our non-verbal brain functioning, but they do help us to communicate
with others, and even to apply logic to our decisions. But when we make decisions, there are often a lot of factors that come
into play, many of which may be non-verbal. Hence, why we sometimes come to conclusions and actions that are not always logical,
but they usually do represent our actual desires.
Our non-verbal brain functions are very powerful but by definition are difficult to explore and explain.
-- Brian William Drisko, 24-Oct-2008 2228 bwd@advaitism.com
Sometimes you want to scream and run out of the movie theater.
But once you realize it is just a movie,
that nothing can harm you,
and that there is no you in the movie to be harmed,
you can walk back in and enjoy the rest of the movie.
-- Brian William Drisko, 14-Mar-2010 1222 bwd@advaitism.com
When considering the death of the self there are only two possibilities:
Either the self will eventually die and
there is nothing we can do to avoid it;
Or the self will never die and
there is no need to do anything to avoid it.
What is the point of worrying what will become of our self?
There is either no way to avoid eventually coming to harm or
there is no way to ever come to harm.
There is either nothing that can be done or
nothing that need be done, or both.
-- Brian William Drisko, 14-Mar-2010 1255 bwd@advaitism.com
Of the numerous bizarre ideas in modern spirituality, probably my least favorite is the notion
that you bring your sickness on yourself. The suggestion is that when one's understanding is wider
and more expansive then sickness doesn't arise, or if it does, it is seen as irrelevant. We are
told that all we have to do is "let go" or "see rightly" and all will be corrected. This means
that if you're sick, you're an idiot. Not only are you sick, but you're spiritually flawed on top
of it, which is a truly ugly notion.
-- Wayne Liquorman in Never Mind - A Journey into Non-duality, pg 15
Compassionate/Understanding vs Intolerant/Demanding
An
intolerant/demanding person will be
intolerant/demanding of a
compassionate/understanding person. A
compassionate/understanding person will be
compassionate/understanding of an
intolerant/demanding person.
The Language Archive, a play by Julia Chao, World Premiere directed by Mark Brokaw,
South Coast Repertory, Segerstrom Stage, March 26 - April 25, 2010.
-- Brian William Drisko, 09-Apr-2010 2252 bwd@advaitism.com
Main Menu:
Some Initial Questions And Answers
Advaitism In A Nutshell
Observations /
Comments /
Reflections /
Quotes /
Notes
Books, Video, Audio, Podcasts /
On Being Adopted
FAIR USE NOTICE:
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically
authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific,
spiritual, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such
copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with
Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who
have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposes. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond
'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Home | Top of Page